Monday, August 8, 2011

Even if all scientific explanations turned out to be wrong

that would not mean a deity made anything happen. All of these, "If there's no God, how do explain x?" questions amount to different forms of the fallacy "argument from incredulity". Creationism ends up being a form of the fallacy "erting the consequent". The watchmaker argument is a form of the "fallacy of composition". Are there any theistic arguments that don't turn out to be fallacies?

No comments:

Post a Comment